As a Western Buddhist, one is invariably faced with two separate claims to truth, neither of which one is usually prepared to deny completely. These two claims are those of the Buddhist tradition and the Western situation. Such a tension between a tradition and a particular situation is hardly unique to those of us caught vacillating between these alternatives today. It is a quality which has characterised the developments and been instrumental in the transformation that Buddhism has undergone from the very first beginnings of its history.
This polarity has tended to encourage two primary attitudes towards resolving the conflict between the claims of the tradition as opposed to those of the situation. For there are always certain people who are more inclined towards accepting the authority of tradition at its face value, and others who feel it to be more important to evaluate the heritage of the tradition in the light of its own views, reason itself, and contemporary exigencies. Consequently, the former tend to take belief as their primary attitude, whereas the latter generally consider reason to be primary.
However, it is oversimplifying matters to divide such attitudes into these mutually opposing camps. In the majority of individual cases there is more of an unstable amalgam of belief and reason which causes the mind to oscillate between the two alternatives. Even the adoption of a traditionalist stance is usually preceded by a process of reasoned reflection which culminates in a preference for belief over reason. Likewise the "situationalist", as long as he remains a Buddhist, has his tendency to free-thinking constantly held in check by whatever degree of faith secures him within the fold of the Buddhist tradition.
Belief and reason, then, become the two points of departure for embarking upon a conscious commitment to Buddhism. If we turn to the words attributed to the Buddha himself we find a number of passages to support both attitudes. In most cases the Buddha seems to speak directly from the standpoint of his enlightenment in the manner of a benevolent authority, thus encouraging a confident acceptance of what he teaches. Yet on other occasions, as in the discourse spoken to the people of Kalama, he considerably undermines his own authority by asserting)' that one should not rely upon ""what has been acquired by repealed hearing; hi upon tradition;... nor upon what is in a scripture;... nor upon the consideration "The monk is our teacher." " Add to this the various conflicting perspectives found In the Mahayana discourses, and it becomes even more difficult to unravel the intended meaning of the Buddha's speech. Thus it becomes clearer why the Buddha encouraged his followers to test his words as carefully as an assayer would examine gold. And "only then should they be accepted; but not merely out of respect for."
Among all the major world religions Buddhism has a singularly ambigious. relationship to its own scriptural record, because for a Buddhist direct experience and insight are finally the only reliable touchstones of certainty. Hence both belief and skepticism, reason and faith can all be encouraged provided (hey assist one on the way to enlightenment. The sutras are able to act as signposts along this way, but it is no simple matter to determine how much certainty they provide us about our destination.
II
In approaching the idea of the Buddhist community or Sangha we have to take into account the frequent divergent claims of the tradition and the current situation. Depending upon our leaning, we will either stress the importance of maintaining the traditional communal forms, or the importance of adapting these forms to the needs and peculiarities of the present situation. Yet prior to any question of its form is the question of what it is that actually constitutes the spiritual life of the Buddhist community. What is it that really unifies people as Buddhists? And how can this bonding factor be best understood and maintained?
A genuine sense of community comes into being when people share a common concern as well as the determination to sustain it. As the central focus of the Buddhist vision are those four truths which become progressively realised through the stages along the way to enlightenment. These four higher truths (aryasatya) provide an essential orientation to the practice of Buddhism. They indicate what needs to be done away with, what needs to be accomplished, and the means to reach those ends. In this way they summarise most concisely and completely the object of every Buddhist's concern.
The higher Buddhist community (aryasangha) is comprised of those whose convictions about the four truths are founded on neither belief nor reason alone but on direct experience and insight. The majority of Buddhists, however, are unified only through a faithful and rational concern for these truths. Their vision still retains varying degrees of conceptualization and uncertainty, thus rendering their spiritual communion into an approximation of that of the higher community. Sangha, therefore, is a reality which encompasses a wide range of shared concerns, reaching its most authentic expression when people are united through a vision of the four higher truths.
The more preliminary and unstable is the nature of this concern, then the more does it need to be nourished by the power of commitment. In Buddhism the matrix of commitment is established in the act of entrusting oneself to the Three Jewels, Such a commitment injects a quality of constancy into what may otherwise be a momentary and fluctuating concern. It involves a restructuring of one's inner life around the principles of the Buddha, Dharma and Sangha and a conscious turning away from whatever stands in opposition to these values. In elevating one's concern for the four truths to a higher degree of continuity, this commitment thereby effectively serves to support and sustain the concern.
The aim of the Buddhist community is to authenticate its central concern through direct vision and experience. Belief and reason alone are unable to strengthen a shared sense of community beyond the limits imposed by their own inherent fallibility. This process of authentication depends primarily upon each
individual's own effort to deepen his or her insight into the meaning of the four truths. But as a communal endeavor, it also depends upon the maintainance of a form which effectively supports the realization of its inner aim.
III
Traditionally, the form of the Buddhist community has been equated with that of the Buddhist monastic community (bhikksusangha). Although it has usually been accepted that inclusion in the higher community is not restricted to monks and nuns, since the time of the Buddha himself the term "Sangha" has been commonly used only to denote the community of fully ordained monastics. Because of their ethical discipline and freedom from the burdens of the householder's life, historically monks and nuns have had the greatest opportunity to realize the four truths and thus sustain the momentum of the Buddhist tradition. Even the Mahayanist introduction of a wider-based community structured around the ideal of the Bodhisattva has only partially affected the general notion of the community's being identical with the monastic order.
There is certainly a good case to be made in support of this traditional view of Sangha. Yet although it would be foolish to deny the value of the monastic life as an important basis of the Buddhist community, it is open to question whether the monastic order alone should preserve such a monopoly on the concept of "community". Monasticism is one particular form of Sangha which over time has proven to be a fairly resilient model for supporting the inner aim of Buddhism. But surely when confronted with any new situation, it becomes the responsibility of the community to determine exactly where its active forces are presently working and in which direction they are moving.
Although proponents of the traditional view of Sangha find considerable support through scriptural authority, they tend to give little attention to the role that situations have played in conditioning the forms of the community. To what extent, for example, has the monastic order been influenced in its development by social, cultural and even economic factors? In formulating his idea of a monastic community, how far was the Buddha himself merely responding to the given historical circumstances of his time? These questions are difficult to answer, but they need to be borne in mind if we are ever to discover a middle way between the conflicting claims of the Buddhist tradition and our present situation.
With every move that Buddhism has made, it has been affected by the influence of the circumstances in which it has sought to take root. Depending upon the level of diversity between the tradition and the new situation, it has felt that influence to a greater extent, as in Japan, or a lesser extent, as in Burma. Conversely, each situation which has been exposed to Buddhism has also been modified. In Tibet and the Southern countries, this modification has been considerable, whereas in China has been less. No matter where we look we can observe this mutual process of give and take.
It is just as unrealistic to maintain that traditional Buddhism can significantly transform our present world as it is to believe that the integrity of the tradition will be inevitably subverted by exposure to modernity and change. The future being unpredictable and the twists and turns of history largely unreasonable, it is hard to imagine the direction that Buddhism will take in the West. Given the extent of diversity, however, between the tradition and our current situation, we should be prepared for at least an unprecedented kind of interaction between the two. Thus in whatever course we decide to follow, we need always to remind ourselves of the experimental character of our undertaking. And in recognizing our own limitations, we should remain open to the alternative pursuits of others.
Buddhism is still sufficiently strong to maintain and further evolve its own identity. But the more it becomes consolidated in a non-Asian setting, the greater becomes the need to define the role and meaning of the term "Sangha ". For the founding of a genuine sense of community is without doubt one of the most important elements needed to ensure the continuity of the Buddhist tradition.
...Read more!

